1.
[28:48] | felemmâ câehümü-lḥaḳḳu min `indinâ ḳâlû levlâ ûtiye miŝle mâ ûtiye mûsâ. evelem yekfürû bimâ ûtiye mûsâ min ḳabl. ḳâlû siḥrâni teżâherâ. veḳâlû innâ biküllin kâfirûn. |  فلما جاءهم الحق من عندنا قالوا لولا أوتي مثل ما أوتي موسى أولم يكفروا بما أوتي موسى من قبل قالوا سحران تظاهرا وقالوا إنا بكل كافرون
فَلَمَّا جَاءَهُمُ الْحَقُّ مِنْ عِندِنَا قَالُوا لَوْلَا أُوتِيَ مِثْلَ مَا أُوتِيَ مُوسَى أَوَلَمْ يَكْفُرُوا بِمَا أُوتِيَ مُوسَى مِن قَبْلُ قَالُوا سِحْرَانِ تَظَاهَرَا وَقَالُوا إِنَّا بِكُلٍّ كَافِرُونَ |
|---|
| Elmalılı | Fakat onlara tarafımızdan o hak (peygamber) gelince, "Musa'ya verilen (mucizeler) gibi ona da verilmeli değil miydi?" dediler. Peki daha önce Musa'ya verileni de inkâr etmemişler miydi? "Birbirini destekleyen iki sihir" demişler ve şunu söylemişlerdi: "Doğrusu biz hiçbirine inanmıyoruz." | | Y. Ali | But (now), when the Truth has come to them from Ourselves, they say, "Why are not (Signs) sent to him, like those which were sent to Moses?" Do they not then reject (the Signs) which were formerly sent to Moses? They say: "Two kinds of sorcery, each assisting the other!" And they say: "For us, we reject all (such things)!"
| | Words | | فلما - But when| جاءهم - came to them| الحق - the truth| من - from Us| عندنا - from Us| قالوا - they said,| لولا - "Why not| أوتي - he was given| مثل - (the) like| ما - (of) what| أوتي - was given| موسى - (to) Musa?"| أولم - Did not| يكفروا - they disbelieve| بما - in what| أوتي - was given| موسى - (to) Musa| من - before?| قبل - before?| قالوا - They said,| سحران - "Two magic (works)| تظاهرا - supporting each other."| وقالوا - And they said,| إنا - "Indeed, we| بكل - in all| كافرون - (are) disbelievers."| | | Pickthal | But when there came unto them the Truth from Our presence, they said: Why is he not given the like of what was given unto Moses? Did they not disbelieve in that which was given unto Moses of old? They say: Two magics that support each other; and they say: Lo! in both we are disbelievers. | | Arberry | Yet when the truth came to them 'from Ourselves, they said, 'Why has he not been given the like' of that Moses was given?' But they, did they not disbelieve also in what Moses was given aforetime? They said, 'A pair of sorceries mutually supporting each other.' They said, 'We disbelieve both.' | | Shakir | But (now) when the truth has come to them from Us, they say: Why is he not given the like of what was given to Musa? What! did they not disbelieve in what Musa was given before? They say: Two magicians backing up each other; and they say: Surely we are unbelievers in all. | | Free Minds | But when the truth came to them from Us, they said: "If only he was given the same that was given to Moses!" Had they not rejected what was given to Moses before? They had said: "Two magicians assisting one another." And they said: "We reject all these things." | | Qaribullah | So when the truth (Prophet Muhammad) came to them from Us, they said: 'Why is he not given the like of that which was given to Moses? ' But did they not also disbelieve in that which Moses was given before! They say (about Moses and Aaron): 'Two sorcerers supporting one another! ' And they said: 'We disbelieve both. ' | | Asad | And yet, now that the truth has come unto them from Us, they say, "Why has he not been vouchsafed the like of what Moses was vouchsafed?" [As the Quran frequently points out, the basic ethical truths enunciated in it are the same as those of earlier revelations. It is this very statement which induced the opponents of Muhammad - in his own time as well as in later timees - to question the authenticity of the Quran: "If it had really been revealed by God," they argue, "would so many of its propositions, especially its social laws, differ so radically from the laws promulgated in that earlier divine writ, the Torah?" By advancing this argument (and quite apart from the question of whether the text of the Bible as we know it today has or has not been corrupted in the course of time), the opponents of Muhammad's message deliberately overlook the fact, repeatedly stressed in the Quran, that the earlier systems of law were conditioned by the spiritual level of a particular people and the exigencies of a particular chapter of human history, and therefore had to he superseded by new laws at a higher stage of human development (see in this connection the second paragraph of 5:48 and the corresponding note). However, as is evident from the immediate sequence - and especially from the last sentence of this verse - the above specious argument is not meant to uphold the authenticity of the Bible as against that of the Quran, but, rather, aims at discrediting both - and, through them, the basic religious principle against which the irreligious mind always revolts: namely, the idea of divine revelation and of man's absolute dependence on and responsibility to God, the Ultimate Cause of all that exists.] But did they not also, before this, deny the truth of what Moses was vouchsafed? [For] they do say, "Two examples of delusion, [seemingly] supporting each other!" [A contemptuous allusion, on the one hand, to Old-Testament predictions of the coming of the Prophet Muhammad (cf. surah 2:42), and, on the other, to the oft-repeated Quranic statement that this divine writ had been revealed to "confirm the truth of earlier revelations". As regards my rendering of the term sihr (lit., "magic" or "sorcery") as "delusion" - and occasionally as "spellbinding eloquence" - see note on 74:24.] And they add, "Behold, we refuse to accept either of them as true!" | | Diyanet Vakfı | Fakat onlara tarafımızdan o hak (Peygamber) gelince: "Musa'ya verilen (mucizeler) gibi ona da verilmeli değil miydi?" dediler. Peki, daha önce Musa'ya verileni de inkar etmemişler miydi? "Birbirini destekleyen iki sihir!" demişler ve şunu söylemişlerdi: Doğrusu biz hiçbirine inanmıyoruz. | | Diyanet | Ama onlara katımızdan gerçek gelince: "Musa'ya verildiği gibi buna da mucize verilmesi gerekmez mi?" dediler. Daha önce Musa'ya verileni de inkar etmemişler miydi? "Yardımlaşan iki sihir (Tevrat ve Kuran); hepsini inkar edenleriz" dediler. | | Edip Yüksel | Tarafımızdan kendilerine gerçek ulaştığında, "Keşke Musa'ya verilen (mucizeler) in bir benzeri bize de getirilseydi!" dediler. (Aynı kafa yapısına sahip olanlar) daha önce de Musa'ya verilenleri inkar etmemişler miydi? "Birbirini destekleyen iki büyü (kitabı) dır. Biz ikisini de reddediyoruz," dediler. | | Suat Yıldırım | Buna rağmen yine de kendilerine tarafımızdan hakikat, (yani Kur'ân ve Peygamber) gelince: “Mûsa’ya verilen mûcizelerin benzeri ona da verilse ya!” diyorlar.Oysa daha önce Mûsâ’ya verilen vahyi de inkâr etmemişler miydi?Ve hatta: “Bunlar, birbirini destekleyen iki sihir (aldatmaca) biz hepsini reddediyoruz!” demişlerdi. [10,78; 23,48; 74,24] | | Yaşar Nuri Öztürk | Fakat hak, katımızdan kendilerine geldiğinde şöyle dediler: "Mûsa'ya verilenin aynısı buna da verilseydi ya!" Bunlar daha önce Mûsa'ya verileni inkâr etmemişler miydi? Şöyle demişlerdi: "Birbirini destekleyen iki büyü/sırt sırta iki büyücü." Ve dediler: "Biz bunların ikisine de inanmıyoruz." | | Abdulbaki Gölpınarlı | Fakat katımızdan o gerçek gelince de Musa'ya verilen mucizeler gibi mucizeler verilseydi ona derler; önce Musa'ya verilen mucizeleri de inkar edip iki büyü, birbirini desteklemede bunlar demediler mi ve şüphesiz biz, hepsini de inkar ediyoruz demediler mi? | | Ali Bulaç | Fakat onlara Kendi Katımız'dan hak geldiği zaman: "Musa'ya verilenlerin bir benzeri buna verilmeli değil miydi?" dediler. Onlar, daha önce Musa'ya verilenleri inkar etmemişler miydi? "İki büyü birbirine arka çıktı" dediler. Ve: "Gerçekten biz hepsini inkar edenleriz" dediler. | | Süleyman Ateş | Fakat onlara katımızdan hak gelince: "Musa'ya verilenin eşi, buna da verilmeli değil miydi?" dediler. Daha önce Musa'ya verileni de inkar etmemişler miydi? "Birbirine destek olan iki büyü", dediler. "Biz hepsini inkar ederiz", dediler. | | Önceki [28:47]< >[28:49] Sonraki |
|
